Habit elevates time to a second power enabling nature’s transition into spirit

Evidence

In a certain sense the notion of ις defines a kind of time within time, as if time (ρνς) could, in the transition from a simple πθς to the µεταλ that belongs to the process of ις, exhibit a strange ability to double itself. For ις, as second nature, involves a second nature of time which no longer is part of nature. Nature is repeated because it is transformed; ις is a power elevating time itself to the second power. If Hegel does indeed treat habit as the determining moment of the Anthropology, it is because habit makes possible the transition of nature into spirit, revealing and putting into perspective a temporality no longer belonging to the simple rule of time. — Catherine Malabou, The Future of Hegel, 485

Categorization

  • XREF: The ā€˜time to the second power’ via hexis is exactly the plasticity-temporality nexus the reader seeks — second nature as the brain/body concept linking Hegel to neural plasticity. — connects to: Change presupposes a self-sustained nihilating synthesis rather than mere given becoming; Plasticity and habit define man’s place between animal and divine limits — Catherine Malabou, The Future of Hegel: Plasticity,…, 317; Habit makes the soul regain a second nature (+10 more)
  • SEED: Essay angle: ā€˜second nature of time’ — how acquired habits generate a temporality that no longer follows natural rhythm, applicable to learning, skill, and neuroplastic change.
  • DEEPTHINKING: ā€˜Nature is repeated because it is transformed’ — dense dialectical formulation where repetition and transformation coincide rather than oppose; the temporal doubling is profound.
  • corroborated: 3 independent passages support this claim — Catherine Malabou, The Future of Hegel: Plasticity,…, 485

Broader Connections