Gun lobbies reframe gun shows as freedom of assembly to block regulation
Evidence
Gun lobbies oppose any effort to close the gun-show loophole. They compare gun shows with shows of benign products and characterize unregulated firearms sales as an expression of citizens’ passion for freedom. Such portrayals are justifications for opposing background checks at gun shows. — Albert Bandura, Moral Disengagement, 1094
Categorization
Category: Causal Relationships
Related
- Advantageous comparative metaphors justify opposing background checks (similarity 0.85)
- About 40% of gun buyers face no background checks at gun shows and online. (similarity 0.83)
- Gun makers frame lethal products as rights to defend their most profitable items (similarity 0.82)
- The NRA opposes all gun regulation by framing restrictions as a slippery slope (similarity 0.82)
- Gun industry profits drive escalating weapons lethality and rights framing (similarity 0.81)
- Gun advocates reframed policy defense as protecting law-abiding citizens’ constitutional rights. (similarity 0.80)
- Defending lax gun laws requires numbing moral qualms about gun violence (similarity 0.80)
- Weapons shape a person’s sense of agency by transforming their perceived power (similarity 0.80)
- Gun regulation loopholes can convert safety measures into more lethal devices. (similarity 0.80)
- Gun advocates reframe regulation challenges as elite attacks on patriotic freedom (similarity 0.80)
- Gun makers shift blame for lethal designs onto consumer demand. (similarity 0.79)
- Congress cannot pass effective gun regulation in any form (similarity 0.79)
- Policymaking battles rage over weak, unenforced gun data because research is suppressed. (similarity 0.79)
- Risky products like guns create public fear and harm not caused by fashion. (similarity 0.79)
- The NRA suppresses voluntary gun buybacks for image reasons (similarity 0.79)