Guaranteed income historically implied work duties tied to citizenship.

Evidence

As Peter Sloman has observed, the first version of Rhys-Williams’s proposal was accompanied by a strong conditional clause by which workers would sign a “social contract” committing themselves to full participation in the labor market. Only in later versions of her proposal did the work requirement and its contractual dimension disappear. In fact, Friedman’s disconnection of income from any type of duty strongly contrasted not only with nineteenth-century poor relief and social security schemes, but also with the modern notion of “rights.” Rights were rarely thought to be independent of an understanding of citizenship and its accompanying range of duties, in particular the duty to work. — Anton Jäger and Daniel Zamora Vargas, Welfare for Markets, 107

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to my prior chapter claims that basic income’s defining feature is being monetary/unconditional rather than in-kind — this shows how radical detaching income from work duties was against earlier citizenship models. — connects to: Friedman’s poverty floor was political, not economic, necessity. — Anton Jäger and Daniel Zamora Vargas, Welfare for Markets: A Global History…, 118; New Deal Keynesians favored services and full employment over direct cash transfers — Anton Jäger and Daniel Zamora Vargas, Welfare for Markets: A Global History…, 143; Citizenship shifted from automatic mass grant to individual earned privilege (+4 more)
  • SHARE: Someone steeped in basic income history debates (the Rhys-Williams workfare element is often neglected) would enjoy this.

Broader Connections