Group solidarity can form through shared bodily practice, not shared ideas

Evidence

Yet, the silence was not mute. A culture’s rhythms, sounds, and motions can create a kind of physical togetherness, meanings that cannot be reduced to words or beliefs or ideas, but has to be experienced in practice. Part of what constitutes membership in a group is a way of existing in a body: Cultural effects may or may not depend upon semiotic ”content,” meaning, or claims of representation. — Nina Eliasoph, Avoiding politics, 686

Categorization

  • QUESTION: Is embodied togetherness a genuine alternative to ideological solidarity, or does it depend on unstated shared beliefs that the ethnographer cannot access?
  • XREF: Directly relevant to the reader’s core question — solidarity via positive shared activity, not enemy-out-group framing. — connects to: Subjectivity forms through practice, not prior to it. — Yael Arbell, The Circle of Commoning:…, 85; Integration should reduce bodily visibility as a measure of social worth, not change identities. — Sivamohan Valluvan, Conviviality and Multiculture: A…, 39; Collective ways of life depend on embodied practice, not just recognition of group identity. — Talal Asad, Formations of the Secular:…, 868 (+15 more)

Broader Connections