Group interviews can surface opinions suppressed in individual questioning

Evidence

Among the advantages of group interviewing, he mentioned that in group discussions of around two hours in length pre-conscious opinions of the informants which were not accessible to normal questioning methods came to light; that the group atmosphere led the informants to express views and feelings they would sense as intolerant and would therefore have suppressed in normal interviews; that matters expressed in a group discussion appeared in a recognizable context; that the juxtaposition of contradictory opinions that was characteristic of everyday life was reproduced in group discussion; that some members of the group tended to express public' views different from the private’ ones given in their personal interviews, the former being more likely to provide evidence of their real behaviour; and that informants expressed themselves less cautiously and defensively in the company of those who were like-minded, or even members of the same club, than they would do in the normal interview situation. β€” Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School, 1869

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Lays out the early rationale for the focus-group method in compact list form.
  • corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim β€” Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School: Its History,…, 1869
  • XREF: connects to: The focus group method combined questionnaire, projective, and interview techniques β€” Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School: Its History,…, 1871; Group discussion technique captures opinions as they form rather than correcting them afterward β€” Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School: Its History,…, 2023; Group discussion research must analyze group dynamics and character structures to interpret expressed opinions β€” Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School: Its History,…, 1878 (+1 more)

Broader Connections