Gradualist worker cooperatives still depended on surviving inside capitalist markets

Evidence

However, the peaceful approach of the guild socialists that sought to achieve revolution through gradual change meant that in practice guilds would have to operate and survive, at least initially, within a monetary capitalist economy. Producing in a capitalist economy meant that the building guilds had to purchase their plants, equipment, and raw materials in an inherently volatile market. As guild socialists themselves realized, “it is not easy to isolate a particular industry or a part of a particular industry and to make of it an oasis of Guild organization in the midst of a capitalistic system” (Cole 1921b, 18). — Clara E. Mattei, The Capital Order, 444

Categorization

  • XREF: Resonates with the reader’s prior material on how non-capitalist enclaves (e.g., ivory towers, silo systems, free-trade zones) must interface with the surrounding market order. — connects to: Workers pursued a use-value economy through state-aided cooperatives alongside capitalism — Clara E. Mattei, The Capital Order: How Economists…, 420; Cooperatives defined profit as benefiting workers, not invested capital — Clara E. Mattei, The Capital Order: How Economists…, 425; Worker cooperatives failed from capital scarcity and capitalist supplier discrimination — Samuel Bowles and Herbert Gintis, Schooling in Capitalist America:…, 641 (+4 more)

Broader Connections