Giving birth cannot confer existential meaning because freedom must found itself.

Evidence

But this is only an illusion. Because she does not really make the child: it is made in her; her flesh only engenders flesh: she is incapable of founding an existence that will have to found itself; creations that spring from freedom posit the object as a value and endow it with a necessity: in the maternal breast, the child is unjustified, it is still only a gratuitous proliferation, a raw fact whose contingence is symmetrical with that of death. The mother can have her reasons for wanting a child, but she cannot give to this other—who tomorrow is going to be—his own raisons d’être; she engenders him in the generality of his body, not in the specificity of his existence. — Simone de Beauvoir, The Second Sex, 1450

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Distinguishes biological propagation (immanence) from free existential creation (transcendence) — core Beauvoirian apparatus.
  • XREF: Connects to Sartre’s nothingness/freedom and the contrast between quasi-object creation and genuine founding. — connects to: Freedom’s responsibility falls on the self alone despite one’s un-chosen birth.; Freedom cannot choose itself and thus creates things and situation. — Jean-Paul Sartre, Being and Nothingness: An Essay on…, 1205; Freedom is synonymous with the for-itself’s lack of being — Jean-Paul Sartre, Being and Nothingness: An Essay on…, 1328 (+7 more)

Broader Connections