General speech and assembly rights both enable and are shaped by demonstrations

Evidence

The more general attachment of demonstrations to citizens’ rights and obligations with regard to speech, association, and assembly, in contrast, produces effects in two directions. First, expansions or contractions of rights to speech, association, and assembly inevitably impinge on demonstrations whether or not they begin with demonstrations. But second, by their incorporation of claims to identity, standing, and program, demonstrations challenge authorities to resist or recognize shifts in boundaries between tolerated and forbidden political actors, actions, and claims. — Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 1199

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Contrast with 1197: general rights jurisprudence does NOT segregate demonstrations from wider rights, so demonstrations ride expansions/contractions of speech, association, assembly and in turn push those boundaries. This binary — special jurisprudence segregate vs general rights open two-way — is the formal backbone of the reader’s test.
  • corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim — Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 1199
  • XREF: connects to: Rights of association, assembly, and speech determine where social-movement mobilization concentrates — Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 1178; Spanish 2011 protesters organized horizontally with consensus-based assemblies — Vincent Bevins, If We Burn: The Mass Protest Decade and…, 261; Regimes can grant freer speech while tightening their grip on organized action. (+3 more)

Broader Connections