Fully describing utopia would betray it because it is a becoming, not a being

Evidence

Like freedom, the intelligible character as a subjective possibility is a thing that comes to be, not a thing that is. It would be a betrayal to incorporate it in existence by description, even by the most cautious description. In the right condition, as in the Jewish theologoumenon, all things would differ only a little from the way they are; but [how things would then be cannot be conceived even in the slightest]. — Dirk Braunstein, Adorno’s Critique of Political Economy, 1539

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Captures Adorno’s negative-dialectical view: freedom and utopia resist incorporation into descriptive existence.
  • XREF: connects to: Utopian visions reveal a system’s limits only through failed attempts at transcendence — Fredric Jameson, Postmodernism, or, The Cultural Logic…, 470; The utopian ideal of deconstructive existence may already be socially realized as postmodernism — Fredric Jameson, Postmodernism, or, The Cultural Logic…, 732; Art expresses utopian harmony negatively by embodying contradictions unresolved — Martin Jay, The Dialectical Imagination: A History…, 549 (+8 more)

Broader Connections