Art expresses utopian harmony negatively by embodying contradictions unresolved

Evidence

A dialectical, or “immanent,” critique of art, Adorno argued, “takes seriously the principle that it is not ideology in itself which is untrue but rather its pretension to correspond to reality.” 35 One way in which art might offer a “true” foretaste of the future society was in its harmonious reconciliation of form and content, function and expression, subjective and objective elements. … “A successful work, according to immanent criticism, is not one which resolves objective contradictions in a spurious harmony, but one which expresses the idea of harmony negatively by embodying the contradictions, pure and uncompromised, in its innermost structure.” ” In other words, until social contradictions were reconciled in reality, the utopian harmony of art must always maintain an element of protest. — Martin Jay, The Dialectical Imagination, 549

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Defines ‘immanent critique’ as the Adornian method for judging art — core terminology for anyone orienting in critical theory.
  • XREF: This utopian-negativity formulation connects to the reader’s broader critical-theory canon work and to Adorno’s later Aesthetic Theory. — connects to: Adorno’s negative dialectics located emancipation’s hints in modern art’s distortion — Alex Callinicos, Against Postmodernism: A Marxist…, 380; Art’s continued existence testifies to a paradox that grounds all beauty; Art is trapped between utopian longing and the charge of false comfort — Theodor W. Adorno, The Culture Industry: Selected Essays…, 66 (+17 more)

Broader Connections