Freirean liberatory pedagogy can endanger students inside prisons

Evidence

Enabling Freire’s vision of a problem-posing pedagogy often means tasking students with the responsibility of challenging hierarchical structures, a practice which, in the context of prisons, might result in harm. For students in jails and prisons, the stakes are simply higher. Most facilities have a strict ban on any material tagged with the potential to incite a riot. In the words of Dylan Rodriguez (2006), “the student in prison is never really free to learn” (p. 104), and thus the prison-educator is beholden to a unique set of constraints. — James D. Kirylo (ed.), Reinventing Pedagogy of the Oppressed, 401

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to the reader’s interest in applied critical pedagogy: Freire’s liberatory framework assumes a freedom that carceral settings structurally revoke, a genuine tension in the pedagogy-of-the-oppressed tradition. — connects to: Freirean world-reading pedagogy becomes ethically fraught inside prisons — James D. Kirylo (ed.), Reinventing Pedagogy of the Oppressed:…, 406; Dialogue-based pedagogy faces near-impossible conditions inside jail and prison settings — James D. Kirylo (ed.), Reinventing Pedagogy of the Oppressed:…, 392; Critical pedagogy’s attentiveness to denied agency becomes absurd in prison — James D. Kirylo (ed.), Reinventing Pedagogy of the Oppressed:…, 405 (+3 more)
  • DEEPTHINKING: Captures a real paradox inside liberatory pedagogy: the emancipatory classroom practice can directly threaten the very students it aims to free, so the educator’s stance must shift from provocation to protection.

Broader Connections