For Durkheim, society itself is the source that makes norms sacred and binding

Evidence

But Durkheim also believed that social integration depended on normative integration—or, as Pierre Bourdieu has recently put it, that “logical integration is the pre-condition of moral integration.” “Normative” integration depended in turn on the strength or weakness of the norms in society—or what Durkheim called the conscience collective . But the source of the norms and rules was society itself . Thus logical categories had society as their source of origin. It was “society”—the source of the normative—which made the rules “sacred,” and therefore binding, and “society” which men worshipped. — Hall, Stuart, Essential Essays, Volume 1, 355

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Defines the conscience collective and how society grounds normative and logical integration in Durkheim’s thought.
  • XREF: This Kant-via-society grounding of categories connects to the broader idea of social construction underpinning Gramscian and Hallian cultural theory. — connects to: Durkheim held society itself is the source of logical and moral categories — Hall, Stuart, Essential Essays, Volume 1, 355; Durkheim’s sociology holds that all morality originates in society’s coercive civilizing force — Zygmunt Bauman, Modernity and the Holocaust, 486; Durkheim founded social science by positing society as an objective order independent of individuals — Timothy Mitchell, Colonising Egypt, 388 (+5 more)
  • yield-rescued: below the book’s yield-target cutoff, included anyway for connecting to: Durkheim held society itself is the source of logical and moral categories — Hall, Stuart, Essential Essays, Volume 1, 355; Durkheim’s sociology holds that all morality originates in society’s coercive civilizing force — Zygmunt Bauman, Modernity and the Holocaust, 486; Durkheim founded social science by positing society as an objective order independent of individuals — Timothy Mitchell, Colonising Egypt, 388 (+5 more)

Broader Connections