FBI informants fabricated and drove the entire Newburgh terror plot

Evidence

The Newburgh Four case illustrates how entrapment works. This is the story of four African American men from poor families, two of whom had psychological issues, and all of whom had trouble with the law at various points. When David Williams was approached by an FBI informant, his younger brother had just been diagnosed with liver cancer. The family desperately needed money, and the FBI informant, Shahed Hussain, promised that and more. David’s aunt Alicia McWilliams, who became an activist around his case, says that David ā€œwatched his brother almost die and be revived five times. He knew [his brother] Lord needed a liver. The whole experience took him for a loop.ā€ The informant capitalized on this vulnerability and incited David and three others to carry out a plan to bomb synagogues in the Bronx. Hussain not only picked the sites and drove the four men there, he provided them with what they were told were bombs—and even badgered one man who said he refused to kill women and children, eventually convincing him to go forward with the plan. Without Hussain, the ā€œterror plotā€ would not have existed. — Deepa Kumar, Islamophobia and the Politics of Empire, 587

Categorization

Category: Factual Claims

  • SEED: An article angle: the manufactured-terrorism pipeline — how paid informants select and walk vulnerable targets through plots that could not otherwise occur, and what this says about what ā€˜counterterrorism’ actually funds.
  • XREF: Connects to similar entrapment patterns documented in the post-9/11 prosecutions literature and to the general pattern of institutional incentives creating the crimes they then ā€˜solve’.