Falling recording costs turned data from peripheral to central capitalist resource.

Evidence

Data were a resource that had been available for some time and used to lesser degrees in previous business models (particularly in coordinating the global logistics of lean production). In the twenty-first century, however, the technology needed for turning simple activities into recorded data became increasingly cheap; and the move to digital-based communications made recording exceedingly simple. Massive new expanses of potential data were opened up, and new industries arose to extract these data and to use them so as to optimise production processes, give insight into consumer preferences, control workers, provide the foundation for new products and services (e.g. Google Maps, self-driving cars, Siri), and sell to advertisers. All of this had historical precedents in earlier periods of capitalism, but what was novel with the shift in technology was the sheer amount of data that could now be used. — Nick Srnicek, Platform Capitalism, 44

Categorization

  • XREF: The claim that cheapened recording, not surveillance intent, drove the data economy is the causal mechanism that differentiates Srnicek from Zuboff’s emphasis on surveillance as the driver. — connects to: Data plays the role today that money played in industrial capitalism — Nick Couldry & Ulises A. Mejias, The Costs of Connection: How Data Is…, 278; Capitalism is poised to consume its last remaining outside via data — Nick Couldry & Ulises A. Mejias, The Costs of Connection: How Data Is…, 68; Falling manufacturing profits drove capitalism toward data extraction via platform monopolies — Nick Srnicek, Platform Capitalism, 17

Broader Connections