Failing to integrate masses into the state produces a stunted, dependent ruling class
Related
- State weakness cannot explain the mafia’s emergence (similarity 0.84)
- Citizenship institutions assumed individual exceptional cases, not mass statelessness (similarity 0.82)
- Mass adhesion is the critical test of an ideology’s historical rationality (similarity 0.82)
- Ideological change happens through class struggle, not through ideas alone (similarity 0.80)
- Cultural influence detached from popular masses lacks real political weight (similarity 0.80)
- Nonviolent mass action handed liberation to the petit bourgeoisie (similarity 0.80)
- Social stability must never come at the cost of necessary change or social justice (similarity 0.80)
- A unified hierarchical mafia reduces internal conflict and public violence. (similarity 0.80)
- Democracy can function on recognition by only a minority (similarity 0.79)
- A ruling party exercises hegemonic power without formal juridical rule (similarity 0.79)
- Black masses organized openly while intelligentsia pursued supplication (similarity 0.79)
- Cohesion and trust check government power, not merely establish social order (similarity 0.79)
- Hegemony means tendential balance, not absolute class victory (similarity 0.79)
- Masses are people unintegratable into common-interest organizations (similarity 0.79)
- Consolidated Western civil society blocks the Russian-style seizure of state power. (similarity 0.79)