Citizenship institutions assumed individual exceptional cases, not mass statelessness
Related
- Failing to integrate masses into the state produces a stunted, dependent ruling class (similarity 0.82)
- Any single policy leaves most citizens feeling shortchanged (similarity 0.81)
- State weakness cannot explain the mafia’s emergence (similarity 0.80)
- Social stability must never come at the cost of necessary change or social justice (similarity 0.80)
- Declining ex-imperial societies scapegoat minorities to explain their problems (similarity 0.80)
- A party’s birth depends on exceptional individuals before necessity hardens. (similarity 0.80)
- Sub-castes vary more in status than castes do, invalidating sub-caste abolition first. (similarity 0.79)
- Reflective thought arises only in crisis situations, yet caste breaks trigger none. (similarity 0.79)
- Institutions used as instruments can be destroyed by their own alignment with compromised allies. (similarity 0.79)
- Elite police rule requires admitting neutral masses to bolster itself (similarity 0.79)
- Institutional and legal constraints give people strong external incentives to be trustworthy (similarity 0.79)
- Camp experience resists comparison with prior institutions of suffering. (similarity 0.79)
- Scriptural reinterpretation is useless against caste; authority itself must be denied (similarity 0.78)
- Crises lasting decades reveal incurable structural contradictions that resisting forces work to mend. (similarity 0.78)
- Autocratic states have been consistently attractive as U.S. base hosts. (similarity 0.78)