Facts shift constantly while manipulative techniques stay stable across millennia

Evidence

The benefit of this technique-level approach to updating the vaccine has to do with the future of truth and how we define falsehood. Our scientific understanding of the facts can evolve quickly – especially during a crisis – and often with a fair amount of uncertainty. … In contrast, as I have often done throughout this book, by defining misinformation in terms of the techniques that underlie its production, we arrive at a more stable understanding of falsehood. What was considered flawed reasoning over 2,000 years ago, in Aristotle’s time, is still considered flawed reasoning today. Unless we fundamentally change the rules of logic or what counts as media manipulation, the techniques I have identified in this book are going to remain deceptive for a long time to come. Although they might evolve, become more sophisticated and contagious, their basic properties will remain similar, so we don’t have to combat a continuously moving target. — Sander van der Linden, Foolproof, 1003

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Defines the core distinction between fact-based and technique-based definitions of misinformation, grounding the book’s central method.
  • XREF: connects to: Inoculation can target faulty reasoning tactics rather than specific facts — Sander van der Linden, Foolproof: Why Misinformation Infects…, 962; Rhetoric and style have served as attention-capture disciplines for millennia; Pseudoscientific beliefs persist and re-emerge across media generations — W. David Marx, Blank Space: A Cultural History of the…, 601 (+6 more)

Broader Connections