Experiments are a form of conversation, not discovery

Evidence

To me, an experiment is a kind of conversation with plants: I have a question for them, but since we don’t speak the same language, I can’t ask them directly and they won’t answer verbally. But plants can be eloquent in their physical responses and behaviors. Plants answer questions by the way they live, by their responses to change; you just need to learn how to ask. I smile when I hear my colleagues say “I discovered X.” That’s kind of like Columbus claiming to have discovered America. It was here all along, it’s just that he didn’t know it. Experiments are not about discovery but about listening and translating the knowledge of other beings. — Robin Wall Kimmerer, Braiding Sweetgrass, 552

Categorization

  • XREF: The conversation-as-experiment frame is the polyad’s core method claim, bridging listening (Soundscape), observation-as-method (Reading the Landscape), and the more-than-human voice thread. — connects to: Dialogue is an existential necessity, not a technique for exchanging ideas — Paulo Freire, Pedagogy of the Oppressed, 262; True knowledge requires oral dialogue, not mere reading — James W. Carey, Communication as Culture- Essays on
, 639; The goal of dialogue is dissent or paralogy, not consensus — Jean-François Lyotard, The Postmodern Condition: A Report on
, 453 (+4 more)
  • ADDENDUM: Directly extends ‘Grafting & Growth’ argument that sentient plants demand collaborative, not extractive, relationships.
  • SEED: Seed for an essay on how the language of ‘discovery’ in Western science (and exploration) masks the prior knowledge of those who already dwelt there — plants and people.
  • CANDY: ‘Experiments are not about discovery but about listening’ pairs well with the Columbus joke for an elevator conversation.

Broader Connections