Exit trajectories hinge on a person’s developmental core need

Evidence

Critically, none of these heterogeneous exit trajectories can be understood without reference to the developmental core need, which allows for interpretive nimbleness and flexibility with respect to understanding an individual’s entry and exit patterns. Without such nimbleness and flexibility, we remain captive to linear and dichotomous understandings that restrict the possibilities for the disengagement and deradicalization process. — Amy Fisher-Smith, Charles R. Sullivan, John D. Macready, and Geoffrey Manzi, Identity Reconfiguration and the Core…, 855

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to the disengagement literature on ‘pull’ vs ‘push’ factors and to studies of cult exit, where re-affiliation often substitutes one totalizing community for another. — connects to: Attitude-behavior gaps may stem from developmental shifts toward cognitive control — , Rudman, Laurie A - On the Nature of…, 2031; Learning-by-alteration and actualizing-a-habit are two different kinds of transition — Catherine Malabou, The Future of Hegel: Plasticity,…, 445; Temporal structures mediate between individual life-plans and systemic requirements. — Hartmut Rosa, Social Acceleration: A New Theory of…, 46 (+2 more)

Broader Connections