Exclusive social circles can transform a stigmatized identity into a chic asset.
Evidence
It is this phase of fashion that is received by sensitive and peculiar persons, who use it as a sort of mask. They consider blind obedience to the standards of the general public in all externals as the conscious and desired means of reserving their personal feeling and their taste, which they are eager to reserve for themselves alone, in such a way that they do not care to enter in an appearance that is visible to all. It is therefore a feeling of modesty and reserve which causes many a delicate nature to seek refuge in the leveling cloak of fashion; such individuals do not care to resort to a peculiarity in externals for fear of perhaps betraying a peculiarity of their innermost soul. We have here a triumph of the soul over the actual circumstances of existence, which must be considered one of the highest and finest victories, at least as far as form is concerned, for the reasons that the enemy himself is transformed into a servant, and that the very thing the personality seemed to suppress is voluntarily seized, because the leveling suppression is here transferred to the external spheres of life in such a way that it furnishes a veil and a protection for everything spiritual and now all the more free. — Georg Simmel, on individuality and social forms_…, 734 (
#qualifies, via linked claim)
Categorization
- XREF: connects to: Conformity to fashion can shield and protect an individual’s inner difference. — Georg Simmel, on individuality and social forms_…, 734
Related
- Conformity to fashion can shield and protect an individual’s inner difference. (similarity 0.88)
- Fashion substitutes for class and profession as a source of individual differentiation. (similarity 0.83)
- Formality’s mask grants freedom from full personal responsibility for one’s appearance (similarity 0.81)
- Appeals to quality over quantity mask class privilege (similarity 0.80)
Broader Connections
- Conformity to fashion can shield and protect an individual’s inner difference.
#qualifies(0.72) — Georg Simmel, on individuality and social forms_…, 734