Even technically accomplished Orientalist scholarship rests on racist and mercenary assumptions.
Evidence
His main concern is to convey the message that the overall image of the Orient constructed by Cultural-Academic Orientalism, from the viewpoint of its own technical achievements and scientific contributions to the field, is shot through and through with racist assumptions, barely camouflaged mercenary interests, reductionistic explanations and anti-human prejudices. It can easily be shown that this image, when properly scrutinised, can hardly be the product of genuinely objective scientific investigation and detached scholarly discipline. — Sadik Jalal al-‘Azm, Orientalism and Orientalism in Reverse, 9
Categorization
- XREF: Connects directly to the broader Said-orientalism debate and to critiques of objectivity in area studies.
Related
- Prominent critics of Orientalism have praised scholars deeply complicit in its assumptions. (similarity 0.88)
- Orientalism is only the visible tip of a larger modern structure. (similarity 0.86)
- Academic Orientalist expertise legitimizes rather than corrects crude stereotypes (similarity 0.86)
- Orientalism’s claim to scholarly attention rests on its uniqueness among fields (similarity 0.85)
- Orientalism’s scientific pretense requires positing a permanent, unchanging Orient (similarity 0.85)
- Orientalism must be examined at both the general and the individual level (similarity 0.85)
- Even putatively impartial scientific Orientalism remains an egoistic interpretive act that rebuilds its object. (similarity 0.85)
- Said’s critique of Orientalism is inadequate for refashioning the discipline. (similarity 0.84)
- Orientalism’s error is essentializing both Orient and West from above (similarity 0.84)
- Orientalist scholarship confirms rather than unsettles existing ideas about the Orient. (similarity 0.84)
- Orientalism is studied via its internal consistency, not its correspondence to a real Orient (similarity 0.84)
- The Orientalism debate presumes scholarship and ideology are opposites (similarity 0.84)
- Orientalism regularizes how the Orient is taught and administered (similarity 0.84)
- Orientalism reflects the producing culture rather than its putative object (similarity 0.84)
- Anti-Orientalist critics ignored the actual scholarly merits of Orientalist findings (similarity 0.84)