European multichannel loudness experiments matched listener judgments to model predictions.

Evidence

Listeners matched loudness between loudspeakers in different locations using these signals and their adjusted levels were compared to measured levels. Altogether it was an impressive undertaking. There are many details in the results, but some substantive conclusions were: It is important to know that even the less successful test signals and metrics were not in error by an amount that is likely to degrade entertainment value. — Toole, Floyd E, Sound reproduction- the acoustics and…, 1182

Categorization

• QUESTION: The paragraph trails into ‘substantive conclusions were:’ that follow in 1183 only — worth tracking whether the detailed AES papers are worth chasing.
• XREF: connects to: Model-computed and measured loudness match across the full level range — Professor Dr.-Ing. Hugo Fastl, Professor Dr.-Ing. Eberhard, Psychoacoustics- Facts and Models, 1288; Computerized loudness models track the 1 kHz tone within 2 percent — Professor Dr.-Ing. Hugo Fastl, Professor Dr.-Ing. Eberhard, Psychoacoustics- Facts and Models, 1750; Loudness-matching experiments are designed around ecological validity of real-world listening. — Dijk, Pim van, Physiology, Psychoacoustics and…, 1530 (+1 more)
• yield-rescued: below the book’s yield-target cutoff, included anyway for connecting to: Model-computed and measured loudness match across the full level range — Professor Dr.-Ing. Hugo Fastl, Professor Dr.-Ing. Eberhard, Psychoacoustics- Facts and Models, 1288; Computerized loudness models track the 1 kHz tone within 2 percent — Professor Dr.-Ing. Hugo Fastl, Professor Dr.-Ing. Eberhard, Psychoacoustics- Facts and Models, 1750; Loudness-matching experiments are designed around ecological validity of real-world listening. — Dijk, Pim van, Physiology, Psychoacoustics and…, 1530 (+1 more)