Ethnoreligious violence stems from human social psychology, not Buddhism’s tenets

Evidence

Tessa Bartholomeusz (2002) claimed a strong just war doctrine exists within Theravada Buddhism. However, as Premasiri points out, Buddhism emphasizes nonviolence, but “considers conflict as an unavoidable evil in society” (Premasiri 2006: 82). Violence thus has little to do with Buddhism and much to do with the socio-psychological cravings of human society. — Neil DeVotta, Sinhalese Buddhist Nationalist Ideology, 86

Categorization

  • QUESTION: Challenges the common thesis that Theravada Buddhism legitimized the civil war; worth pursuing how much the Buddhist church’s wartime role actually diverged from the religion’s founding ethics.
  • XREF: connects to: A religion’s violence depends on context, not inherent character; Popular blame of religious belief for violence remains scientifically untested; Cultural racism explains Muslim violence through religion rather than lived circumstances — Deepa Kumar, Islamophobia and the Politics of…, 621 (+14 more)

Broader Connections