Eroded ā€˜master concepts’ lose their explanatory reach over social phenomena.

Evidence

The extent to which this is true for morally and politically loaded words such as ā€œlibertyā€ is likely to vary with time, place, and culture. Take, for example, the transformation of the ā€œhonor codesā€ at various venerable universities. These codes were phrased in quite general terms at their inception in the 18th and 19th centuries because these schools contained homogeneous student bodies who shared a common conception of the type of conduct definitionally incorporated within the word ā€œhonor.ā€ If a person thought that purchasing a term paper from a professional term paper service was consistent with being honorable, then that person simply did not know what ā€œhonorā€ meant. As values have changed and as student bodies have become less homogeneous, however, shared definitions of terms such as ā€œhonorā€ have broken down. Some people now do think that buying a term paper can be honorable, and this breakdown in shared meaning has caused general references to ā€œhonorā€ to be displaced in such codes by more detailed rules. There may now be little shared agreement about what the precept ā€œbe honorableā€ requires, but there is considerable agreement about what the rule ā€œdo not purchase a term paperā€ requires. — Frederick Schauer, Formalism, 27 (#expands, via linked claim)

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: Collective identities erode rather than vanish, losing their former social and explanatory stability.; Cultural meanings are unstable and shift with the social field; Abstracted theory that loses local situatedness betrays Cultural Studies’ core method. (+5 more)

Broader Connections