A purely data-driven human science has lost the thinking that defines it

Evidence

The Spirit is a conclusion, a syllogism, an integral whole in which component parts are meaningfully preserved (aufgehoben). The integral whole is a conclusive form. But without Spirit, the whole world falls apart into merely additive, unincorporated elements. Spirit constitutes the world’s interiority (Innerlichkeit) and composure (Sammlung): what gathers, or composes (versammelt), everything within itself. Theory is also conceptual – syllogistic – because it comprehends all the elements it includes. Ultimately, the ‘end of theory’ that Chris Anderson has trumpeted means taking leave of Spirit. Big Data makes Spirit – that is, thinking and thought – wither and die. Human science – Geisteswissenschaft – that is purely data-driven is, in fact, no longer human; it has no Geist, or Spirit. Totalized data-knowledge amounts to absolute ignorance: the absolute zero of Spirit. — Byung-Chul Han, Psychopolitics, 163

Categorization

  • QUESTION: Is the pun Geisteswissenschaft/Geist substantively persuasive, or mere verbal wordplay? Want to test Han’s claim that data-driven humanities are literally no longer human.
  • XREF: connects to: Social sciences may themselves be complicit in datafied hollowing out of the social — Nick Couldry & Ulises A. Mejias, The Costs of Connection: How Data Is…, 431; Eroded ‘master concepts’ lose their explanatory reach over social phenomena.; A science can rest on psychological data yet serve non-psychological aims — Georg Simmel, on individuality and social forms_…, 207 (+2 more)

Broader Connections