Environmental racism comprises siting, enforcement, and exclusion of people of color from decisions

Evidence

Benjamin Chavis, then head of the United Church of Christ’s Commission on Racial Justice (1987), deïŹned the term ‘environmental racism’ as racial discrimination in the enforcement of environmental laws, the siting of toxic waste disposal and polluting industries, and the exclusion of people of color from environmental decision-making (Chavis 1993: 3). — David Schlosberg, Defining Environmental Justice, 190

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Chavis’s canonical definition names all three injustice strands — distribution (siting), procedure (exclusion from decisions) — in one concise formulation.
  • XREF: Chavis’s tri-part definition visibly anticipates Schlosberg’s distributive/procedural/recognition typology, tying this chapter directly into the book’s analytic framework. — connects to: Both mainstream environmentalism and civil rights ignored poor communities of color — Luke W. Cole and Sheila R. Foster, From the Ground Up: Environmental
, 112; Analyzing environmental racism requires structural, procedural, and normative frames jointly — Luke W. Cole and Sheila R. Foster, From the Ground Up: Environmental
, 334; Black EPA staffers privately told activists about racist working conditions in the EPA — Luke W. Cole and Sheila R. Foster, From the Ground Up: Environmental
, 923 (+7 more)
  • recurring: this claim recurs 2 times within its source

Broader Connections