Environmental injustice persists without racist intent because bias is structurally embedded

Evidence

Even if racism is not explicitly intended, it remains structurally embedded. Merely because the distribution is caused by, for example, market forces rather than targeting minorities does not mean that the overall process is just. Whether an industry purposefully locates in an overwhelmingly minority area, the very existence of so many polluting sites in poor and minority areas illustrates institutionalized racism, classism, and misrecognition. As Cole and Foster (2001: 65–6) assert, if ‘existing racially discriminatory processes in the housing market, for example, contribute to the distribution of environmental hazards, or of people of color, then it is entirely appropriate to call such outcomes unjust, and even racist’. — David Schlosberg, Defining Environmental Justice, 221

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Defines institutionalized racism as injustice traceable to structurally embedded bias, independent of individual intent — key to the recognition-justice vocabulary.
  • ADDENDUM: Contributes to the trivalent-justice toolset: shows distribution outcomes being re-read as recognition failures via structural analysis.
  • XREF: connects to: Industry and government rebut environmental racism claims by denying any racist intent — David Schlosberg, Defining Environmental Justice:…, 220; Empirical distributional studies only scratch the surface of environmental racism’s causes — Luke W. Cole and Sheila R. Foster, From the Ground Up: Environmental…, 292; Courts reject impact-based environmental racism claims absent proven intentional discrimination — Luke W. Cole and Sheila R. Foster, From the Ground Up: Environmental…, 327 (+9 more)

Broader Connections