Enlightenment liberal democracy defines freedom negatively as freedom from interference.

Evidence

In the political philosophical theory of Enlightenment philosophers John Locke (1632–1704) and Jean Jacques Rousseau (1712–1778), the role of the state is primarily to protect individual freedom and to secure opportunities to satisfy personal goals and interests. Liberal democracy’s approach to freedom is negative in the sense that it emphasizes “freedom from” interference, in particular from the state. It is an argument for the primacy of the individual over the state. — Rebecca A. Martusewicz, Jeff Edmundson, and John Lupinacci, EcoJustice Education, 358

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Concise teachable definition of ‘negative freedom’ as freedom-from-state-interference — a key contrast term for the textbook’s eco-justice frame.
  • XREF: connects to: Elite distrust of ordinary citizens shaped America’s representative form of governance. — Rebecca A. Martusewicz, Jeff Edmundson, and John Lupinacci, EcoJustice Education: Toward Diverse,…, 353; Negative liberty means being free from interference in one’s choices. — Frank Lovett, Republicanism, 7; Even Rousseau justifies democracy only negatively as non-violation — Wendy Brown, Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s…, 403 (+8 more)

Broader Connections