Egypt’s 1820 conquest replaced merchant trade knowledge of Sudan with state fact-finding missions

Evidence

But with the official Egyptian expansionist campaigns into the Sudan in 1820, Muhammad Alï institutionalized the relationship between Egypt and the Sudan. Selim Qapudan's fact-finding mission was completely different from Muhammad al-Tunisï's. It was the means by which Muhammad Alï hoped to discover the origins of the Nile, whether Sudanese gold existed, and whether the inhabitants of the uppermost regions of the Nile would be suitable as slaves for his increasingly modernized military. Selim Qapudan’s voyage was an important and officially sanctioned postscript to the conquest of the Sudan, and a preamble to a new way of knowing about the Sudan and the Sudanese. Compared to al-Tunisï’s account, where some of the Sudanese were family, even if they were not familiar, Selim Qapudan’s account narrated an experience with colonized subjects, or those whom Egypt expected to colonize. — Eve M. Troutt Powell, A Different Shade of Colonialism_…, 133

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to broader literature on how colonial states monopolize knowledge production about colonized territories, replacing pre-colonial commercial networks of information. — connects to: Egyptian conquest of Sudan reshaped how Egyptian society gained and privileged knowledge; Egyptian colonial tools in Sudan were limited to propaganda and cultural affinity; Egypt functioned simultaneously as colonized and colonizer of Sudan — Eve M. Troutt Powell, A Different Shade of Colonialism_…, 527 (+4 more)
  • corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim — Eve M. Troutt Powell, A Different Shade of Colonialism_…, 133

Broader Connections