Economic models serve as engines of analysis, not photographic records of reality

Evidence

Friedman’s methodological views were, therefore, not a precise prescription for how economics should be done. His view that economic theory was “an `engine’ to analyze [the world], not a photographic reproduction of it” (1953a, p. 35) was in a sense a truism: a theory that incorporates all detail, as if photographically, is clearly as much an impossibility as a map that reproduces exactly every aspect and feature of terrain and landscape. Nevertheless, the view that economic theory was an “engine” of inquiry, not an (infeasible) camera faithfully reproducing all empirical facts, was important to the developments discussed in this book. — Donald MacKenzie, An Engine, Not a Camera, 61

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Clarifies the engine/camera figure the reader’s entire study rests on — the crucial definitional counterpoint to the real thesis.
  • XREF: connects to: Economists’ modeling may bend economic reality toward theoretical assumptions — Donald MacKenzie, An Engine, Not a Camera: How Financial…, 116; Economic theories function as analytic engines rather than exact copies of reality.; A market model can shape markets actively rather than merely describing them — Donald MacKenzie, An Engine, Not a Camera: How Financial…, 1165 (+4 more)

Broader Connections