Early expert critiques demanded distinguishing Islam from Muslims in defining Islamophobia

Evidence

However, it questioned the use of ‘Islam’ rather than ‘Muslim’ as a marker of identification because of the apparent lack of differentiation between Islamic beliefs and principles, and the practice and action of Muslims as individuals and communities. Similarly, whilst the revd Dr David Thomas from the Centre for the Study of Islam and Christian-Muslim relations (CSIC) at the University of Birmingham acknowledged the timeliness of identifying a contemporary anti-Muslim trend, he also argued that the findings would be ‘strengthened if you could specify how this form of hostility differs in quality and kind from other instances of xenophobic feeling … crucial to distinguish the various types of Islamophobia (going deeper than listing aspects)’. Whilst there appeared to be a sense that Islamophobia was less than clear, Professor Jorgen nielsen galvanised the point: ‘the term Islamophobia needs to be defined more rigorously’. Nielsen identified an unsystematic shifting between markers of ‘Islam’ – as an abstract and complex web of ideas, concepts and beliefs – and ‘Muslim’ – referring to a person or people whose lives are informed and shaped to varying degrees by those same ideas, concepts and beliefs. As he concluded, ‘an unfortunate consequence of the paper’s justified concern with Islamophobia is that it paints a picture weak on context’. — Chris Allen, Islamophobia, 270

Categorization

  • XREF: Nielsen’s Islam/Muslim distinction prefigures Halliday’s ‘anti-Muslimism’ terminological critique the reader is tracking across camps. — connects to: The OED’s first cited use defined Islamophobia as a directed anti-Muslim phenomenon; Efforts to define Islam are what define understanding of Islamophobia — Chris Allen, Islamophobia, 415; An acknowledged Muslim or Islamic element is the defining criterion of Islamophobia — Chris Allen, Islamophobia, 776 (+1 more)