Early British struggles won exceptional rights that later struggles re-purposed toward class and citizenship

Evidence

These political arrangements had emerged from earlier struggles, including multiple rebellions and two revolutions (Tilly 2004b, chap. 5). In 1750, the Glorious Revolution lay only six decades back, the contested settlement of Germany-based Hanoverians on the British throne was only thirty-six years old, and major rebellions against royal power had shaken Scotland or Ireland several times in the memory of living men and women. In the course of those struggles, Britain’s people had gained unusually extensive rights to assembly, association, petition, privacy, and criticism of authorities. During the ninety years following 1750, however, two monumental changes altered the everyday uses of those rights, and established new ones: (1) the formation of a new class system, more strongly marked by industrial capitalism, and (2) bargaining out of mass citizenship on a national scale. In both regards, British experience preceded that of most European neighbors. — Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 363

Categorization

  • XREF: This is squarely the reader’s interest: constitutional rights (assembly, petition, privacy, criticism) first won by rebellion, then later repurposed — a candidate mechanism for how institutional absorption channels vs. defuses politicization. — connects to: Rights of assembly were won through struggle but then contained by new police forces. — Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 1327; English nationalism’s race-feeling stems from liberty conceived as inherited privilege — Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism, 466; Germany and England objectified class struggle through different institutional routes — Georg Simmel, on individuality and social forms_…, 307 (+11 more)
  • DEFINE: Identifies which specific rights constitute the British institutional absorption regime the reader wants to test against Tilly’s framework.
  • corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim — Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 363

Broader Connections