Each Marxian premise alone yields reductionism or relativism

Evidence

The search for and designation of the seminal figure should have been by this time recognized as a frequently misconceived and reductionist venture. This seems particularly the case when ideas and ideology are the subject of investigation. Whether codified in a didactic or scholastic literature or manifest in social collectives, the elements of consciousness and thought are generally shared by force of circumstance, social and historical continuity, language, culture, and interest. Individual achievement may be seen as the culmination of a collective momentum marked by extraordinary circumstance (imagination, location, etc.). As such it is likely it is being replicated or in the process of coming into being elsewhere, either simultaneously or otherwise. — Cedric J. Robinson, Black Marxism_ The Making of the Black…, 2174 (#expands, via linked claim)

What I have tried to do in this paper is to document the emergence of a new theoretical paradigm, which takes its fundamental orientation from the problematic of Marx, but which seeks, by various theoretical means, to overcome certain of the limitations—economism, reductionism, “a priorism,” a lack of historical specificity—which have beset certain traditional appropriations of Marxism and which still disfigure the contributions to this field by otherwise distinguished writers, leaving Marxism vulnerable and exposed to effective criticism by many different variants of economistic monism and sociological pluralism. — Hall, Stuart, Essential Essays, Volume 1, 631 (#responds-to, via linked claim)

Categorization

Category: Causal Relationships

Broader Connections