Dispossessed white farmers fought land reform through courts, concessions, alliances, and memoirs

Evidence

White commercial farmers who found themselves under compulsion to part with lands they had farmed all their lives fought back to retain ownership of what they felt rightfully belonged to them. Admittedly, quite a number of them had purchased their farms after the advent of independence in 1980 (Buckle, 2001). Their strategies included, among others, making recourse to law courts, availing parts of their lands for occupation by black Zimbabweans, and creating strategic alliances with ZANU-PF politicians. For some, however, writing availed an invaluable pedestal from which they could voice their resistance to their loss. β€” Tavengwa Gwekwerere, Davie E. Mutasa, and Kudakwashe Chitofiri, Settlers, Rhodesians, and Supremacists, 10

Categorization

  • XREF: Relevant to the reading purpose: shows grievance did not simply dissolve with displacement β€” it was contested through multiple channels including a legitimating authorship apparatus. β€” connects to: White Zimbabwean memoirs contest land loss via colonial-era ideology. β€” Tavengwa Gwekwerere, Davie E. Mutasa, and Kudakwashe Chitofiri, Settlers, Rhodesians, and Supremacists:…, 4; Resistance through litigation and land recovery is restoring White Earth forests and culture β€” Winona LaDuke, All Our Relations: Native Struggles for…, 67; White landowners equated landlessness with losing their Whiteness and freedom. β€” Ibram X. Kendi, Stamped from the Beginning: The…, 677 (+4 more)

Broader Connections