Discourse fuses language and action, dissolving any ideology-movement split

Evidence

Since Wittgenstein, we know that language games comprise both linguistic exchanges and actions in which they are embedded, and speech-act theory has put on a new footing the study of the discursive sequences constituting social institutionalized life. It is in that sense that Chantal Mouffe and I have defined discourses as structured totalities articulating both linguistic and non-linguistic elements. From this point of view, the distinction between a movement and its ideology is not only hopeless, but also irrelevant – what matters is the determination of the discursive sequences through which a social force or movement carries out its overall political performance. — Ernesto Laclau, On Populist Reason, 45

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Defines ‘discourse’ as structured totalities of linguistic and non-linguistic elements, the core postulate of Laclau’s theory.
  • XREF: connects to: Ideological emptiness in populism is itself a performative act with social rationality — Ernesto Laclau, On Populist Reason, 50; Discourse collapses the thought-action divide and shapes how the West behaved toward others — Stuart Hall, Essential Essays, Volume 2: Identity…, 569; Words and political talk themselves constitute subversive action (+5 more)

Broader Connections