Discipline is a type of power, not an institution or apparatus

Evidence

‘Discipline’ may be identified neither with an institution nor with an apparatus; it is a type of power, a modality for its exercise, comprising a whole set of instruments, techniques, procedures, levels of application, targets; it is a ‘physics’ or an ‘anatomy’ of power, a technology. — Michel Foucault, Discipline & Punish- The Birth of the…, 338

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Core formal definition of discipline as a modality of power — essential for testing whether Oceania’s telescreens qualify as panoptic.
  • XREF: This is the precise formal definition the reader needs to adjudicate whether Orwell’s telescreens are genuinely panoptic discipline vs. spectacle. — connects to: Disciplinary power fixes a coercive link between body and object rather than extracting products. — Michel Foucault, Discipline & Punish- The Birth of the…, 234; Discipline was proposed as the national principle of a perpetual machine-state — Michel Foucault, Discipline & Punish- The Birth of the…, 253; Disciplinary power is a network function, not a possessed property — Michel Foucault, Discipline & Punish- The Birth of the…, 273 (+4 more)