Disciplinary power aims at maximum effect at minimum cost and resistance.

Evidence

But the peculiarity of the disciplines is that they try to define in relation to the multiplicities a tactics of power that fulfils three criteria: firstly, to obtain the exercise of power at the lowest possible cost (economically, by the low expenditure it involves; politically, by its discretion, its low exteriorization, its relative invisibility, the little resistance it arouses); secondly, to bring the effects of this social power to their maximum intensity and to extend them as far as possible, without either failure or interval; thirdly, to link this ‘economic’ growth of power with the output of the apparatuses (educational, military, industrial or medical) within which it is exercised; in short, to increase both the docility and the utility of all the elements of the system. — Michel Foucault, Discipline & Punish- The Birth of the…, 343

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Sets out Foucault’s formal definition of the discipline’s triple objective, the exact mechanism a Bentham/Foucault comparative reading needs.
  • XREF: Directly relevant to the reader’s project of comparing Orwell’s telescreens to panoptic architecture — the telescreen is disciplinary power operating at low cost and high intensity. — connects to: Executing discipline with minimum necessary force shapes behavior effectively. — Jordan B. Peterson, 12 Rules for Life An Antidote to Chaos, 459; Penal reform aimed to increase punishment’s effects while lowering its costs. — Michel Foucault, Discipline & Punish- The Birth of the…, 135; Power can be physically exercised without resorting to violence or ideology — Michel Foucault, Discipline & Punish- The Birth of the…, 73

Broader Connections