Disciplinary time-tables descend directly from monastic rules

Evidence

The time-table is an old inheritance. The strict model was no doubt suggested by the monastic communities. It soon spread. Its three great methods – establish rhythms, impose particular occupations, regulate the cycles of repetition – were soon to be found in schools, workshops and hospitals. The new disciplines had no difficulty in taking up their place in the old forms; the schools and poorhouses extended the life and the regularity of the monastic communities to which they were often attached. — Michel Foucault, Discipline & Punish- The Birth of the…, 230

Categorization

  • XREF: The monastic origin of the timetable is a genealogy-of-institutions point that parallels how Foucault elsewhere traces power forms from religious to secular institutions — and echoes Weber’s Protestant-work-ethic lineage of industrial discipline. — connects to: Disciplines refined monastic time into ever-finer measurable units — Michel Foucault, Discipline & Punish- The Birth of the…, 230; Disciplines function as machinery for capitalizing and accumulating time — Michel Foucault, Discipline & Punish- The Birth of the…, 239; Institutions laicized religious minute-discipline into technical control of everyday life — Michel Foucault, Discipline & Punish- The Birth of the…, 217 (+2 more)

Broader Connections