Different adversities alter brain regions matched to the developmental stage of harm

Evidence

The pattern that emerged from these findings was not random. In each case, the brain region most affected was the region most heavily involved in processing the specific type of adversity at the specific developmental stage when it occurred. The visual cortex processes the faces of threatening people. The language areas process threatening verbal communication. The somatosensory cortex processes the tactile experience of abuse. … The sensitive-periods framework explained why the same general adversity — growing up in a household where one is hit, humiliated, or frightened — produces somewhat different neurological signatures in different people: the specific timing of the adversity shapes which neural systems are most affected, because different neural systems have different sensitive periods during which they are most plastic and most vulnerable to experience-dependent alteration. — , The Rod and the Child, 9655

Categorization

  • XREF: This is the sensitive-periods framework that the chapter identifies as Teicher’s most theoretically significant contribution; likely revisited in Act Four. — connects to: Residential school harm transmits through behavioral, structural, and biological pathways — , The Rod and the Child: A Global History…, 7131; Childhood adversity dose predicts adult depression, alcoholism, and suicide attempts — , The Rod and the Child: A Global History…, 10671; Corporal punishment reduces the white-matter wiring between prefrontal cortex and amygdala. — , The Rod and the Child: A Global History…, 6242 (+8 more)

Broader Connections