Democratic legitimacy requires tacit constitutional consensus renewed each generation

Evidence

Since then, the widespread background consensus on constitutional principles among the population generally differs from a religiously based legitimation in virtue of being brought about democratically – hence, also through the deliberative exchange of arguments. Such a background consensus must be tacitly renewed in every generation, for otherwise democracies would not endure. — Jürgen Habermas, A New Structural Transformation of the…, 66

Categorization

  • XREF: Extends the 1962 secularization-of-legitimacy argument; also speaks to the restless-renewal theme in the classic public-sphere narrative. — connects to: Deliberative democracy is agonal dissent atop constitutional consensus, not consensus-seeking talk. — Jürgen Habermas, A New Structural Transformation of the…, 19; Media structure enabling deliberative opinion is a constitutional imperative. — Jürgen Habermas, A New Structural Transformation of the…, 49; Constitutional states depend on founding solidarity that later generations must renew through participation — Jürgen Habermas, A New Structural Transformation of the…, 85 (+4 more)
  • ADDENDUM: Directly extends the theory of how legitimacy is generated and renewed, complementing the sacrifice-based account of legitimacy in the third published article.

Broader Connections