Dehumanization of targeted groups makes violence against them seem reasonable.

Evidence

The consequent counter-violence of containments cannot possibly be racist not just because no races exist but also because the threatening expressions it seeks to contain are unrecognized as properly human. It – the projected action as metonym for the person, for the (national) character – is beastly, monstrous, mutant, after all. It places itself outside the bundle of legitimate human preference expression or instrumentalization. As such, we can’t be racist just as we don’t torture. Even as a bad apple, even two perhaps do. The individualization of wrongdoing, its localization as personal and so private preference expression, erases institutional racisms precisely as conceptual possibility. — David Theo Goldberg, The Threat of Race, 1873 (#expands, via linked claim)

Categorization

  • corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim
  • XREF: connects to: Dehumanizing contained groups lets perpetrators deny racism is even possible — David Theo Goldberg, The Threat of Race: Reflections on…, 1873; Collective violence requires dehumanizing victims into abstract categories; Dehumanizing entire groups makes persecution of them socially acceptable (+10 more)

Broader Connections