Defining Islamophobia precisely shapes real resource allocation among rival forms of prejudice.

Evidence

There are also critical policy-making stakes linked to these questions. When civil society groups, antiracist bureaucracies, or politicians allocate their time and money to Islamophobia, they shift resources away from other serious concerns (such as racism, anti-Semitism, anti-Roma sentiments, anti-immigrant prejudice, sexism, homophobia, etc.). How much attention each of these issues receives should be dictated by the most accurate estimate possible of the extent of the problem. Developing Islamophobia as a concrete and usable social scientific concept is therefore not only the basis for meaningful comparative and causal analysis in academia; it is also the foundation for more informed public debates and for more effective policy decisions. β€” Erik Bleich, What Is Islamophobia and How Much Is…, 72

Categorization

  • SEED: Angle: how the definitional politics of a prejudice category becomes a zero-sum competition for anti-racism funding β€” the stakes of concept-formation as policy triage.
  • XREF: connects to: Precise definitions of Islamophobia enable systematic cross-time and cross-group comparisons. β€” Erik Bleich, What Is Islamophobia and How Much Is…, 61; Contested definitions of Islamophobia deepen the rift over its existence β€” Chris Allen, Islamophobia, 37; Islamophobia functions as an indiscriminate umbrella term serving varied agendas β€” Chris Allen, Islamophobia, 542 (+4 more)

Broader Connections