Culturalism’s totality reduces to the simple unity of praxis with homologous contradictions.

Evidence

The difference is that, whereas culturalism would correct the hyper-structuralism of earlier models by restoring the unified subject (collective or individual) of consciousness at the center of “the Structure,” discourse theory, by way of the Freudian concepts of the unconscious and the Lacanian concepts of how subjects are constituted in language (through the entry into the Symbolic and the Law of Culture), restores the decentered subject, the contradictory subject, as a set of positions in language and knowledge, from which culture can appear to be enunciated. — Hall, Stuart, Essential Essays, Volume 1, 204 (#expands, via linked claim)

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: Articulation rejects reducing one societal level to expression of another.; Structuralism inverts culturalism’s claim by making experience an effect of categories; The German Ideology reduces determination to undifferentiated praxis as well as to the economic (+2 more)

Broader Connections