Cultural studies rejects the base-superstructure model of economic determination

Evidence

Here, then, despite the many significant differences, is the outline of one significant line of thinking in Cultural Studies—some would say, the dominant paradigm. It stands opposed to the residual and merely reflective role assigned to “the cultural.” In its different ways, it conceptualizes culture as interwoven with all social practices; and those practices, in turn, as a common form of human activity: sensuous human praxis, the activity through which men and women make history. It is opposed to the base-superstructure way of formulating the relationship between ideal and material forces, especially where the “base” is defined as the determination by “the economic” in any simple sense. — Hall, Stuart, Essential Essays, Volume 1, 191

Categorization

Category: Causal Relationships

  • XREF: Connects to the culturalist vs structuralist debate, which anticipates my interest in how Williams and Thompson differ from Althusser and Levi-Strauss.

Broader Connections