Cultural studies moves beyond ethnography’s presentism toward structural configurations

Evidence

Both projects share the “abiding commitment” of ethnographers “to the principled exploration and reconstruction of social worlds,” their “engagement with … fellow men and women,” and a “commitment to the interpretation of local and situated cultures.” 6 (Our concern was to use such a starting point—concrete events, practices, relationships, and cultures—to approach the “structural configurations that cannot be reduced to the interactions and practices through which they express themselves,” as Bourdieu, another sympathizer with ethnographers, put it. 7 In other words, we sought to emulate the ethnographic imagination but also to move beyond the focus on the here and now of everyday “interactions and practices” by locating them in the histories taking place behind all our backs. — Hall, Stuart, Essential Essays, Volume 1, 1043

Categorization

Category: Causal Relationships

  • QUESTION: How does ‘the histories taking place behind all our backs’ — invisible structural forces — get made visible in Hall’s conjunctural analysis? This is the methodological crux worth pursuing.