Cultural Studies grew from agonistic debate, not progress toward settled orthodoxy

Evidence

One key part of his argument, in trying to dislodge the emerging, triumphalist Grand (Theoretical) Narrative of this fast-developing field, was to recognize that, rather than developing along any smooth pathway toward a set of revealed truths, the forms of Cultural Studies developed in Birmingham had always themselves been driven by the ā€œtheoretical noiseā€ of intense (and often fractious) debate between multiple contestatory discourses. This, he argued, was essential to the intellectual project, which he understood as being founded in a necessarily ā€œagonisticā€ process of debate, which is fundamentally inimical to the final establishment of any form of intellectual orthodoxy. — Hall, Stuart, Essential Essays, Volume 1, 128

Categorization

Category: Definitional Content

  • DEFINE: Introduces Hall’s definition of the intellectual project as ā€˜agonistic’ — a permanent contested process fundamentally opposed to orthodoxy.