Cultural economic packages drive genetic differences even between nearby populations

Evidence

These differences are likely part of a long and meandering evolutionary story and emerged as our ancestors shifted to a heavy reliance on underground roots and tubers over a million years ago. However, just how much populations have depended on starch since then has been influenced by a combination of ecology and cultural evolution, including the practices, preferences, technologies, and know-how of different populations. As we see from the examples above, groups can live relatively close by, in similar ecologies, but still maintain different numbers of AMY1 genes because they operate with different economic packages. — Joseph Henrich, The Secret of Our Success, 311

Categorization

  • XREF: Joins the gene-culture coevolution thesis central to this book with the reader’s coercion-vulnerability frame: culture steers genetic selection, not just transmission of beliefs. — connects to: Culturally accumulated packages can outperform the individuals who inherit them — Joseph Henrich, The Secret of Our Success: How Culture…, 200; Baltic agriculture led to genetic selection for very light skin — Joseph Henrich, The Secret of Our Success: How Culture…, 281; Lactase persistence varies dramatically even among neighboring African ethnic groups. — Joseph Henrich, The Secret of Our Success: How Culture…, 294 (+10 more)

Broader Connections