Critical sport critiques replace one ideological totalization with another

Evidence

It could even be argued that it was Hill’s decision to treat the religious, ideological, and intellectual dimensions of the “English Revolution” seriously in their own terms—and not simply as a simple reflection of economic forces—which saved his work from its earlier tendency to economic reductionism: saved it, that is, not from but for Marxism. (Marxism is not an economic reductionism, although in the period of the Second International Weber could be forgiven for sometimes thinking that it was.) — Hall, Stuart, Essential Essays, Volume 1, 335 (#complicates, via linked claim)

Categorization

• XREF: connects to: Foundational critique revises one discourse while systemic critique transforms an entire épistémè — Wael Hallaq, Restating Orientalism: A Critique of…, 851; Treating ideology seriously in its own terms strengthens rather than dilutes Marxist analysis — Hall, Stuart, Essential Essays, Volume 1, 335; Critical deconstruction of racial ideology can become ideology itself — David Theo Goldberg, John Solomos, A Companion to Racial and Ethnic Studies, 2774 (+4 more)

Broader Connections

• Treating ideology seriously in its own terms strengthens rather than dilutes Marxist analysis #complicates (0.74) — Hall, Stuart, Essential Essays, Volume 1, 335