Controlling for IQ barely weakens the link between education and income

Evidence

The results of ā€œholding constantā€ IQ at a particular level (e.g., average level) is exhibited in the right-hand bars of Figure 4-2. Rather than being of equal height, the right-hand bars arc only slightly different from the left. For instance, in general a person from the ninth decile in education is nearly ten times as likely to be in the top quindle in income as is a person in the bottom education decile; but among people with identical adult cognitive test scores, the former is still eight times more likely to be in the top income quintile than the latter. Holding cognitive attainments constant barely changes the education-income relationship. Hardly comforting for those who assert the economic importance of mental skills in explaining inequality. — Samuel Bowles and Herbert Gintis, Schooling in Capitalist America, 1028

Categorization

  • QUESTION: The ā€˜quindle’ appears to be a typo for ā€˜quintile’ in the source - worth noting for quoting accuracy.
  • XREF: Relates to the education-income vs. IQ causation debate central to Sar Levitan and the human capital tradition readings. — connects to: Schools’ main economic function is not cognitive skill production — Samuel Bowles and Herbert Gintis, Schooling in Capitalist America:…, 996; Income correlates with education independent of measured cognitive skill — Samuel Bowles and Herbert Gintis, Schooling in Capitalist America:…, 1010; Education’s economic payoff has little to do with measured IQ for most people — Samuel Bowles and Herbert Gintis, Schooling in Capitalist America:…, 213 (+6 more)

Broader Connections