Conflict legitimation, not consensus, is modern democracy’s condition of existence

Evidence

One of the keys to the thesis of agonistic pluralism is that, far from jeopardizing democracy, agonistic confrontation is in fact its very condition of existence. Modern democracy’s specificity lies in the recognition and legitimation of conRia and the refusal to suppress it by imposing an authoritarian order. Breaking with the symbolic representation of society as an organic body - which was characteristic of the holist mode of social organization - a democratic society acknowledges the pluralism of values, the ‘disenchantment of the world’ diagnosed by Max Weber and the unavoidable conRicts that it entails. — Chantal Mouffe, The Democratic Paradox, 463

Categorization

  • XREF: Inverts the liberal-deliberative premise that democracy rests on rational consensus; ties to Weber’s disenchantment. — connects to: Democracy channels contention into bargaining over claim-making boundaries — Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 1311; In mature democracies contention turns nonviolent unless state agents block it — Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 428; Adversarial conflict among legitimate positions is democracy’s condition, not its danger — Chantal Mouffe, The Democratic Paradox, 338 (+13 more)

Broader Connections